Team Management Blog 3
‘’According to an analysis by United Kingdom
Commission for employment and Skills (UKCES) has shown that team management
skills are crucial to ensure high performance at work and reliable business
success. Furthermore, with a more qualified Team Management and a dedicated
program of management development have been shown to perform better and have
more sophisticated and higher quality product and market strategies, relatively
low levels of training, shortages of key skills, the failure to apply skills
strategically, and employer concern about the relevance of training provision,
have also been identified as potential reasons to fall behind many of the
competitors in leadership and management capabilities’’ (Department of business
Innovation and Skills, July 2020).
In a business article it was mentioned, ‘’what
the new hire can expect on their first day and more about the business culture,
once the new hire accepted the offer, it may take a few weeks before employee
can take up his duties. Therefore, Human Resource Management Teams shall keep
the new hires excited by sending a congratulation email notifying the joining
date and other facts of the organization. Therefore, Human Resource Teams
should follow to obtain an excited welcome experience to the new Team Member of
the organization’’ (Byford et al. 2016).
Video 1 (International Students at London
Metropolitan University 2020).
The increasing globalization, dynamism and
complexity of the current economy show the convenience of adopting Human
Resource and Strategic Human Resource models to the Team Management. Therefore,
approaches combining the HRM and SHRM principles are essential to achieve
competitive advantages in contemporary developments in people management issues
and practices from a Global perspective (Zhao and Bryar 2001). Furthermore,
Human Resource Management philosophy and Strategic Human Resource principles
offer a virtuous circle for continuous improvement and development of the
organization. Nevertheless, a great number of authors treat HRM and SHRM as two
different theories in an independent system of Team Management practices
(Ruzevicius, 2006).
Content 1 (HRM Vs SHRM n.d).
However, this view is incomplete because
contemporary organization must not only effectively manage the quality of their
products and practices, but also master and apply SHRM theory to accomplish the
growth of team members, where organizations shall lead to long term growth and
business success (Lim et al. 1999).
In short, the adoption of Human Resource
Management and Strategic Human Resource Management model is helpful for
understand the complexity of reality allowing the exchange of experiences and
the benchmarking process of Team Members. These models include elements of
total Team Management are the knowledge architecture for the Business
Administration and the transformation of the organization. Therefore, in this
case, SHRM Strategy must be perceived not as a likely object of a standard
setting, but rather as a phenomenon that could benefit from a set of guidance
(American Productivity and Quality Center, 2000). However, improving the
leadership and team management capabilities, makes sounds business sense,
helping managers at all levels to develop the right skills, and the behaviors
will ensure organizations have the ability to innovate, evolve, to seize the
organizations growth that lie ahead (Wilton et al. 2012).
‘’According to Harvard professor J. Richard
Hackman’s categorization of team outcomes (Hackman, 2002, Wageman, Hackman,
& Lehman, 2005, Wageman et al.,2008), management team are effective to
the extent that they achieve satisfying results in the following
three areas: task performance, induvial well-being and growth, and the team
viability. Management of the teams should, therefore, simultaneously focus on
‘’it’’ accomplishing task results that represent the value of the organization.
‘’I’’ facilitating learning, growth, and development that represent value of
the individual team members; and ‘’We’’ fostering group psychological states
that increase the particular team’s capacity to work interdependently in the
future and that represent added value for the functioning of the management
team’’ (Bang & Midelfart 2017). Following (De Wit, Greet, and Jehn, 2012),
suggest that ‘’We’’ factor (Team Viability) should be considered a special type
of outcome, different from task performance and individual well-being and
growth. Therefore, team viability be emergent states cognitive, motivational,
and effective states that emerge as a product of the context, interaction, and
input factors of the team (Marks, Mathieu, & Zaccaro, 2001).’’Although,
management of the teams are primarily meant to create value for the
organization and the member of the team they should also foster team viability
because it will greatly affect both the team’s task performance and individual
members well-being’’ and growth.
On this dynamic, it was subsequently argued,
helped to explain the difficulties found in smaller organizations with
recruiting and retention of skilled workers (Johnson, 1991). Furthermore,
according to author Arnold, there are 3 components of motivation; Direction is
what a person is trying to do. Effort is how hard a person is trying.
Persistence is how long a person keeps on trying (Arnold 1985). Therefore, SHRM
should provide ‘’unifying frameworks which are at once broad, contingency based
and integrative’’ (Dyer and Holder 1988). ‘’SHRM has been described by (Boxall
1996) as the interface between HRM and strategic management’’. Author observed
‘’ The Strategic HRM literature tends to emphasize the entire HRM system as the
unit of analysis, in contrast to the traditional focus on individual policies
or institute for Employment Studies’’ (Becker et al. 1997). Author (Schuler and
Jackson 2207). Stated that it is about ‘’systematically linking people to step
forward from ‘’Storming’’ stage to ‘’Norming’’ Stage according to Tuckman’s
Theory (Tuckman 1965).
Content 2 (Organizational HR Strategic Planning
Material 2020).
List of References
American Productivity and Quality Center 2000,
123 N, Post Oak Lane, Houston, TX77024.
Arnold 1985, ‘’ Motivation Basic Concepts and
Theories’’. < https://www.themanager.org/2014/12/motivation-basic-concepts-and-theories/>.
Bang, H and Midelfart, T 2017, What
Characterizes Effective Management Teams, A Research-based Approach,
Published in Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 2017,
Vol. 69, No. 4, 334-359.
Becker, B, Huselid, M, Pickus, P, and Spratt, M
1997, ‘HR as a source of shareholder value: research and recommendations’,
Human Resource Management, 36.
Boxall, P 1996, ‘’Strategic HRM debate and the
resource-based view of the firm’’, Human Resource Management Journal, 6
(3).
Byford, M, Watkins, M and Triantogiannis, L
2017, Professional Transitions, Onboarding Is not Enough, newly hired
executives need to be fully integrated into the company’s culture, Harvard
Business Review, (May to June).
De Wit, FRC, Greer LL & Jehn KA 2012,
Paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 97(2), 360-390. doi: 10.1037/a0024844.
Department for Businesses, Innovations and
Skills 2012, Leadership & management in the UK - the key to sustainable
growth, a summary of the evidence for the value of investing in leadership and
management development, London.
Dyer, L and Ericksen, J 2005, ‘' Pursuit of
marketplace agility applying precepts of self-organizing systems to optimize human
resource scalability'', Human Resource Management, 44, pp 183–88.
International Students at London Metropolitan
University 2020, 166-220 Holloway Rd, London N7 8DB, United Kingdom. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97Y5rc0abs4.
Johnson, TP 1991, ‘’Complexity Theory and
Strategic Change: An Empirically Informed Critique’’, British Journal
of Management, 2005.
Lim, KK, Ahmed, PK and Zairi, M 1999, “Managing
for Quality Through Knowledge Management”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 10
Nos 4/5, pp. 615-21.
Marks, MA, Mathieu, JE & Zaccaro, SJ 2001,
''Temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes'', Academy of
Management Review, 26(3), 356-376.
Organizational
Change Management Communications Strategic Material 2020.
Organizational HR Strategic Material 2020.
Ruzevicius, J 2006, “Integration of Total
Quality Management and Knowledge Management”, No. 37, pp. 30-8.
Schuler, R and Jackson, S 1987, ‘Linking
competitive strategies with human resource management practices’, Academy of
Management Executive, 9 (3), pp 207-19.
Wageman, R Hackman, JR & Lehman, E 2005,
Team Diagnostic Survey,’' Development of an Instrument’', Journal of
Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 373-398.
Wageman, R, Nunes, DA, Burruss, JA, &
Hackman, JR 2008, ‘' What it takes to make them great’', Senior Leadership
Teams, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
Wilton, P, Woodman, P, Rudiger, K, Pardey, D,
Tamkin, P, Rabbitts, P 2012, Summary of the evidence for the value of investing
in leadership and team management development, Department for Business,
Innovation & Skills, United Kingdom.
Zhao, F & Bryar, P 2001, Integrating
Knowledge Management and Total Quality, A Complementary Process, 6th
International Conference on ISO 9000 and TQM, Scotland, 2001.



due to changes in global business environment, organizations which have re-organized their workforce into effective, managed and properly designed teams claim substantial
ReplyDeleteimprovements in morale, job satisfaction productivity and quality. These claims have resulted in interest from other organizations keen to share in the possible benefits. Effective team management has really enhanced the rapid response of organizations to the demands of
today’s economy and most of the organizations survive in the increase and rapid change in customers demand by being effective in management of all teams which thereby
encourage and motivate workers to boost their productivity which aids and add quality to customers satisfaction leading to the business productivity (Adeleke, 2008).
Thank you Janaka for your response to my blog. A good rewards system has helped many organizations obtain a talented pool of Team Management and subordinates. It also helped retain the corporate status and reputation. While Taylor’s motivational theory states that workers must be considered as means of raising productivity and money is the only way to motivate them and Herzberg’s theory states that human needs are more important than money and an attention to these needs leads to job satisfaction and productivity hike (Miner 2015).
DeleteWhen it comes to team management, the immediate managers skills in bringing out the best in the employees is paramount. As 37% of employees leave their jobs because of their managers, there are ways and means that can make team management simpler and rewarding. This can be clearly obtained by setting achievable goals which are clear and concise, establish a team mission that brings all employees together, delegating the right roles to the right person are just to name a few. These are a few areas that if executed properly, will lead to excellent team management and delivery.(V. Kashyap, n.d).
ReplyDeleteThank you Melissa for your response to my blog. In short, the adoption of Human Resource Management and Strategic Human Resource Management model is really helpful for understanding the complexity of reality allowing the exchange of experiences and the benchmarking process of Team Members. These models, which include elements of total Team Management are the knowledge architecture for the Business Administration and the transformation of the organization. Therefore, in this case, HRM and SHRM Strategy must be perceived not as a likely object of a standard setting, but rather as a phenomenon that could benefit from a set of guidance (American Productivity and Quality Center, 2000).
DeleteTeam building involves a wide range of activities that are designed to enhance teamwork. Its mission is to bring out the best in a team to ensure self-development, positive communication, leadership skills and the ability to work closely as a team to solve problems (Fapohunda, 2013).
ReplyDeleteMost organizations use management teams at different levels in the hierarchy to oversee and coordinate their businesses. Such teams typically make decisions, solve problems, coordinate tasks, and keep one another informed, and they can strongly influence the performance of an organization. Hence it is vital to identify factors that are associated with effective management-team performance. Based on a review of international research on management and decision-making teams from the early 1980s through today, we have identified a number of variables that seem to be important for the effectiveness of management teams (Bang, H. 2017)
ReplyDeleteThe HR Model defined by Dave Ulrich, HR Guru specifies the roles of HR; strategic partner, change agent, employee champion, and administrative expert. These are essential for the success of the whole HRM Function. Moreover, Dave says, "Talent matters, but teamwork matters more."., "teams to turn individual talent into collective success." According to him, high-performing teams have four successful team dynamics: purpose, governance, relationships and learning (Dave Ulrich, 2019).
ReplyDeleteThank you Mihiran for your response to my blog. A good HRM professional in business management can help organizations to obtain a talented pool of Team Management and subordinates to reach organizational goals (Miner 2015).
Delete