Team Management Blog 9
Reward management is
intrinsic rewards focus on personal accomplishments and psychological
satisfaction, extrinsic rewards are financial in nature and offered mostly in
the form of a pay hike, incentives (Dysvik & Kuvaas 2013). Therefore, pay
rise, incentives form part of extrinsic rewards whereas intrinsic rewards focus
on motivating employees to perform a task. Furthermore, researchers have
identified a strong correlation between the two which says, rewards motivate an
employee to perform well, provide good service and thereby generate profit, and
vice versa (Herzberg 2017). According to Mayo’s theory, employees, if given a
degree of freedom and a feeling of importance, tend work well to achieve
business productivity (Mottershead et al. 2015). Rewards can also be in the
form of verbal appreciation of monetary appreciation. Therefore, a series of
job design-job extension technique is a popular method in HRM used to boost
their morale and sense of responsibility, by adding additional tasks to their
profile (Singleton & Spurgeon 2017). This technique helps motivating an
employee involved in a monotonous nature of job. For example, a receptionist in
an office was delegated the task of hand-delivering mails to employees.
Table 1
Performance management
module administering the performances of Team Management and their teams, the
SHRM module manages the performance of the overall organization. It is the
system where each one’s contribution is acknowledged, and their goals and
objectives are set according to expectations (Ashdown 2014). Furthermore, SHRM
believes that it is also a way to build a cordial relation with line managers
because of the regular and open feedback provided. Therefore, employees get
clarity on their roles and their career paths. Also, it promotes job
satisfaction, thereby improving retention rate, loyalty, and organizational
performance.
Table 2
Organizational SHRM
provides a framework for employees’ roles and responsibilities for them to be
able to perform their jobs properly. Succession planning is one of its biggest
benefits for employers (Stanford 2015). Therefore, having a strong SHRM
structure helps Team Management in identifying potential talent, training them,
and preparing them for bigger roles and the comprehensible structures. SHRM
today, offers potential benefits in increasing profit and productivity in
organizations. It is considered as one of the highest revenue drivers (Taylor
& Woodhams 2016). Some of the SHRM practices have direct impact on profit
and productivity.
Functional flexibility in a workplace is a
process of moving employees from one role to other. This helps employers adopt
to changing structures and gives employees an opportunity to learn. Numerical
flexibility, on the other hand, gives employers an ability to adjust team
members according to demand, it also provides employees flexibility in terms or
workplace and timings (Allen et al. 2013). An example of functional flexibility
in an organization is providing an opportunity to sales and marketing staff to
get into product development and vice versa. Numerical flexibility is provided
through part-time working and telecommute options. Therefore, flexibility in
workplace can be achieved by following said theories of the organizations.
According to these theories, employees are divided into three groups. The core
group consists of multi-skilled employees required to run business
successfully. First peripheral consists of contractors and second peripheral
has outsourced, part-time workers (Kew & Stredwick 2017). For an example,
in Airline industry, productions, sales, cabin crew are form the core team. The
first peripherals are contractors, include maintenance, IT and cargo. Whereas
tele-sales team form the second peripheral.
Technological advancements have immensely
helped in improving efficiency of SHRM practices. Therefore, several
time-consuming tasks can now be done automatically allowing SHRM to focus on
areas increasing productivity such as employee development and corporate
trainings and several practices as payroll, performance management and employee
induction are performed by computer applications (Bondarouk & Olivas-Lujan
2014). Furthermore, through an effective rewards management system, a company
not only keeps employees happy and loyal, but it also saves massive costs of
recruitment and training. Henceforth, when employees are clear about their
roles, responsibilities, and goals, it ensures high performance (Howard et al.
2016). A good rewards system has helped many organizations obtain a talented
pool of Team Management and subordinates. It also helped retain the corporate
status and reputation. While Taylor’s motivational theory states, workers must
be considered as means of raising productivity and money is the only way to
motivate them and Herzberg’s theory states, human needs are more important than
money and an attention to these needs leads to job satisfaction and
productivity hike (Miner 2015).
Table 3
Content 1
Performance management
is a unique 360-degree performance feedback in Team Management which allows
Team Managers to evaluate their team members performance against their members
to assign job task in forming stage according to Tuckman's Theory. Therefore,
an engaging performance management system creates a positive environment and
nurtures growth opportunities (Demartini 2013). This way, employees feel valued
and they are ready to take up more responsibilities and strive to perform well
in any kind of work situations. Performance Management is a process
through Team Management and the SHRM Teams plan and set objectives (Goals) for
an employee and assess the performance based on completion (Cardy &
Leonard 2014). Therefore, the managers review the performance periodically to
ensure their employees know their goals and provide constant feedback instead
of waiting for the annual performance appraisal of the team member.
Furthermore, an employee with a below average performance is provided with a
development plan and an opportunity to get back on the track within a said period.
List of References
Allen, T, Johnson, R., Kiburz, K. & Shockley, K 2013. ''Work–Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements'', Deconstructing Flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), pp. 345-376.
Ashdown,
L 2014, Performance Management.1st (ed.) London.
Bondarouk,
T & Olivas-Lujan, M 2014, Human Resource Management, Social Innovation
and Technology. 1st (ed.).
Cardy,
R & Leonard, B 2014, ''Performance Management'', Concepts, Skills and
Exercises, 2nd (ed.) New Jersey, United States.
Demartini,
C 2013, ''Performance Management Systems'', Design, Diagnosis and Use. 1st (ed.) Hamburg, Germany.
Dysvik,
A & Kuvaas, B 2013, ''Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of
work effort'', the moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 52(3), pp. 412-430.
Herzberg,
F 2017, ''Motivation to Work'', 1st (ed.), New Jersey, United States.
Howard,
L., Turban, D & Hurley, S 2016, ''Cooperating Teams and Competing Reward
Strategies'', Incentives for Team Performance and Firm Productivity., Journal of
Behavioral and Applied Management, 3(3), p. 1054.
Kew,
J & Stredwick J 2017, ''Business Environment: Managing in a Strategic
Context'', 2nd (ed.) London.
Miner,
J 2015, ''Organizational Behavior'', Essential Theories of Motivation and
Leadership. 1st (ed.) New Jersey, United States.
Mottershead,
A., Grant, A., & Kelt, J., 2015, '' OCR Business for A Level'', (1st ed.), London.
Stanford,
N 2015, ''Economist Guide to Organization Design'', 2nd (ed.), Creating
high-performing and adaptable enterprises. 2nd (ed.).
Taylor,
S & Woodhams, C 2016, ''Studying Human Resource Management'', 2nd (ed.) London.




Comments
Post a Comment